Comments on: Time for a tactical change http://acmilanblog.net/2009/09/03/tactical-options/ for all things red and black Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:11:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Milan v Atalanta Preview: Now is the time for a change of tactics | acmilanblog.net http://acmilanblog.net/2009/09/03/tactical-options/comment-page-1/#comment-143 Milan v Atalanta Preview: Now is the time for a change of tactics | acmilanblog.net Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:00:12 +0000 http://acmilanblog.net/?p=552#comment-143 [...] that Leo will change to a 4-4-2 formation which is a system I advocated not so long ago in my ‘Time for a tactical change’ [...] [...] that Leo will change to a 4-4-2 formation which is a system I advocated not so long ago in my ‘Time for a tactical change’ [...]

]]> By: Franky T http://acmilanblog.net/2009/09/03/tactical-options/comment-page-1/#comment-49 Franky T Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:38:01 +0000 http://acmilanblog.net/?p=552#comment-49 1) As for Ronaldinho, if he was just any other player he would be dropped after his poor showing. I believe this would be a strong message from Leo to Dinho that his spot is not certain unless he performs. 2) It is definitely an option I suppose. Though I am not confident it would work. A system with three backs is quite unusual especially in Italy. It might also be a system that many of the players are rather unfamiliar with. 3) About Gattuso I completely agree with you. He is finished. Flamini should be chosen instead. As for Seedorf, though he may not be consistent, he does have a better attitude. When Dinho is not performing, the Dutchman should play. Alternatively, if Abate does not perform, slot Seedorf in on the right. 1) As for Ronaldinho, if he was just any other player he would be dropped after his poor showing. I believe this would be a strong message from Leo to Dinho that his spot is not certain unless he performs.

2) It is definitely an option I suppose. Though I am not confident it would work. A system with three backs is quite unusual especially in Italy. It might also be a system that many of the players are rather unfamiliar with.

3) About Gattuso I completely agree with you. He is finished. Flamini should be chosen instead. As for Seedorf, though he may not be consistent, he does have a better attitude. When Dinho is not performing, the Dutchman should play. Alternatively, if Abate does not perform, slot Seedorf in on the right.

]]> By: aurelio http://acmilanblog.net/2009/09/03/tactical-options/comment-page-1/#comment-47 aurelio Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:28:18 +0000 http://acmilanblog.net/?p=552#comment-47 just 3 remarks. 1) against Livorno I'd give a last chance to R80. 2) let's not forget Onyewu. In the Confederation Cup he was impressive. I wouldn't exclude the option of a 3-4-1-2 scheme with the American along with Tiago and Nesta on the back, Abate-Pirlo-Flamini-Zambro (or Antonini) on the midfield and Dinho behind Pato and the Dutch. What do you think? 3) In my opinion Gattuso is finished and Seedorf is justified only if he can score at least 10 goals... Cheers / Aurelio just 3 remarks.
1) against Livorno I’d give a last chance to R80.
2) let’s not forget Onyewu. In the Confederation Cup he was impressive. I wouldn’t exclude the option of a 3-4-1-2 scheme with the American along with Tiago and Nesta on the back, Abate-Pirlo-Flamini-Zambro (or Antonini) on the midfield and Dinho behind Pato and the Dutch. What do you think?
3) In my opinion Gattuso is finished and Seedorf is justified only if he can score at least 10 goals…

Cheers / Aurelio

]]>